Christianity
is an offense.
If
it were not, a ‘proper’ Sermon (on the Mount) would read (in part) as follows:
Blessed
are the affluent in spirit who live in steadfast piety, for their
copious banking account shall reflect their religious devotion to God.
Blessed
are those who never need mourn, for their comfort is their eternal assurance.
Blessed
are the apologists,
for they will subdue the earth’s heretics with irrefutable truth.
Blessed
are those who hunger and thirst for moral supremacy among the herd,
for they will
be filled with holy indignation toward the other.
Blessed
are those seeking divine mercy,
for they will demand what they will not give.
Blessed
are the pure in the eyes of the other, for the other will verily see
their purity.
Blessed
are the aggressive defenders of God, for they will be called
‘Christians’.
Blessed
are those who lovingly hate the [sin of the] other because of [what is
considered] righteousness, for theirs is the exceptionally high seat of
authority from which they will judge all mankind.
Blessed
are you [Christians] when all people embrace you, extol you, and correctly say
all kinds of praise and flattery about you because of your pious fidelity to
the Christian religion. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your
reward in this life, and the next, for in the very same manner Christ of
Nazareth aggressively defeated his many enemies, so you must also go out into
battle ye mighty warriors, to crush the obscene enemy of God.
(And
more…)
You
have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder, and
anyone who murders will be subject to judgment’. But I tell you that anyone who
is angry with an other who lives outside the parameters of Christianity,
threatening it thus, must publicly abrade this other for such gross immorality.
You
have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for an eye, and tooth for a tooth’. But I
tell you, do everything within your God-given power to resist an evil person, and s/he will flee from you, as God will deliver the victory into your hands.
If
anyone slaps you on the right cheek, do not tolerate such a thing.
And
if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, demand your proper rights in
civil court.
If
anyone forces you to go one mile, let them know the judgment of almighty God
will verily be upon them.
Give
only to those who have proven themselves worthy of your gift, and turn away
every last one who wants to borrow from you without repayment.
You
have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy’. But I
tell you, love your enemies per hating
their humanity, and pray for yourself
that you might escape all persecution, that you may then fully join the
triumphant, religious celebration of your Father’s epic victory over evil—for
He causes his sun to rise only on the Good, and sends rain on all the
unrighteous to alert them as to their reprehensible unrighteousness.
Every
head bowed; every eye closed…
"If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, do not tolerate such a thing."
ReplyDeleteI know where you are going with this. I understand it is a critique of a very popular hermeneutic that Christianity has taken. And I know (or at least I think I know) what you are saying with the quote above. But I'm not convinced
At some point, I have to recognize that a lot of what we see the Christian 'Way' being is a message to the "last", the lowest. And that's not me. I am privileged. I am privileged in more ways than I recognize. Who am I to become in the Kingdom of God? I have privilege and power. I am the brood of vipers. I have the power to change things. Should I give up that power in a romantic attempt at being worthy of blessings? Sounds icky.
I think there is (at times) a rebuking nature to Christ. This is the Jesus (esp. in Matthew) who is (almost) vitriolic in the way he addresses his enemies (the pharisees).
Matt 10:16 - Jesus called his disciples out to be as shrewd as vipers (and as innocent as doves).
So here is where I see the rub:
The Way of the slave--a more appropriately translated word than 'servant'
and
The Way of the (seemingly always non-violent, often subversive) aggressor - "Coercer for the coerced" - Powerful Peacemaker etc.
I don't think these are mutually exclusive all of the time, but I do think there are times when these two options, don't seem to mesh into one subversive, slave-like, aggressive, super option. Especially for someone as privileged as I am.
There's also an included apology for maybe the lack of relevance.
Kyle,
DeleteThanks for commenting. To put it plainly, I am not 'last' or the 'lowest' either.
I believe the radical nature of God's Kingdom is not that we all become 'last'--but that there is no seat of privilege at Christ's table--i.e., all are radically equal.
Also, keep in mind, change is precisely what the 'system' of the world requires in order to remain the same.
The power to change things is the power to maintain the 'system'--which is why the weakness of God is stronger than human strength. (1 Cor 1:25)
Oh for sure, I don't mean systemic change or anything large. But in a situation where maybe everyone's equal (in the Christian sense) but we actually see oppression. In being "the widow's advocate", aren't we in some way being intolerable and not turning the other cheek?
ReplyDeleteIt depends on the 'method' of advocacy. Standing with the oppressed non-violently is still well within Christ's mandate of turning the other cheek.
Delete